Economie politique des inégalités
Thomas Piketty
(EHESS, DEA « Analyse et politiques économiques »)
Organisation du séminaire et bibliographie
(Année universitaire 2003-2004)
Lundi 16h-18h, du 3/11/2003 au 7/6/2004.
Ecole Normale Supérieure (48 bvd Jourdan, 75014 Paris), salle 8 (bâtiment principal)
Direction de travaux d’étudiants : lundi 14h-16h, ENS, bureau 101 (bâtiment B)
Email : piketty@ehess.fr ou thomas.piketty@cepremap.ens.fr
Page web du séminaire : http://www.cepremap.ens.fr/piketty/deaindex.htm
Le cours proprement dit se déroulera du 3/11/2003 au 3/5/2004 (environ 20 séances), et sera suivi du 10/5/2004 au 7/6/2004 (environ 5 séances) par des séances consacrées à des présentations par les étudiants de travaux en cours.
Les références ** sont des lectures obligatoires. Les références * sont hautement recommandées.
Ouvrages généraux sur les inégalités :
A.B. Atkinson et F.
Bourguignon (éd.), Handbook of Income Distribution, North-Holland, 2000
T. Piketty, L’économie des inégalités, éditions La Découverte, collection « Repères », 1997
* T. Piketty, Les hauts revenus en France au 20ème siècle – Inégalités et redistributions, 1901-1998, éditions Grasset, 2001
B. Salanié, Théorie économique de la fiscalité, éditions Economica, 2002
Articles généraux sur les méthodes empiriques (variables instrumentales, expériences naturelles, etc.) fréquemment utilisées dans les articles de la bibliographie :
* J. Angrist et A.
Krueger, "Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From
Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments," Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 15 (4) (2001), pp. 69-87
* M. Bertrand, E.
Duflo et S. Mullainhatan, “How Much Should we Trust Differences-in-Differences
Estimates?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics (2003) [article en format pdf]
** E. Duflo, « Empirical Methods », mimeo MIT, 2002 [article en format pdf]
Les principales sources en
France : enquêtes (Budget des familles, Emploi, Revenus fiscaux, Logement,
etc.) versus fichiers administratifs et fiscaux (IR, ISF, ISu, IS, DADS, CNAF,
etc.) (publications à connaître : INSEE-Synthèses, Rapports du
Conseil d’Analyse Economique, Rapports du Conseil des Impôts, Rapports du CERC,
Notes de la Drees, etc.) (fichiers : Lasmas - page d'accueil
)
Sur les dangers des sources secondaires :
* A.B. Atkinson et A.
Brandolini, « Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of « Secondary »
Data-Sets : Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study », Journal
of Economic Literature 39 (September 2001), pp.771-799
A. Banerjee et E.
Duflo, « Inequality and Growth : What Can the Data Say ? »,
mimeo, MIT, 2000 [article
en format pdf]
K. Deininger et L.
Squire, « A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality », World Bank
Economic Review 10 (3) (1996), pp.565-591 [Deininger-Squire
data set]
2. Les inégalités dans
le long terme : la fin des rentiers (1
séance)
A.B. Atkinson, « Top Incomes in the United
Kingdom over the Twentieth Century », mimeo, Nuffield College, 2003 [article en format pdf]
A.B. Atkinson et W. Salverda, « Top Incomes in the Netherlands and
the United Kingdom over the Twentieth Century », mimeo, Nuffield College,
2003 [article en format pdf]
F. Dell, “Top Incomes in Germany over the 20th Century,
1891-1995”, mimeo, Paris-Jourdan, 2003 [article
en format pdf]
F. Dell, T. Piketty et E. Saez, “Income and Wealth Concentration in
Switzerland ovez the 20th Century”, mimeo, Paris-Jourdan et
Berkeley, 2003 [article en format pdf]
W. Kopczuk et E. Saez, « Top Wealth Shares in the United States,
1916-2000 – Evidence from Estate Tax Returns », mimeo, Columbia et
Berkeley, 2003 [article en format pdf]
T. Piketty, « Les
inégalités dans le long terme », in Inégalités économiques, Rapport
du Conseil d’Analyse Economique n°33 (juin 2001), La documentation française [article en format pdf]
** T. Piketty, « Income Inequality in France, 1901-1998 », Journal
of Political Economy 111 (2003), 1004-1043 [article
en format pdf]
** T. Piketty et E. Saez, « Income Inequality in the United States,
1913-1998 », Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (2003), 1-39 [article en format pdf]
* T. Piketty, G. Postel-Vinay et J.L. Rosenthal, “Wealth Concentration
in a Developping Economy: Paris and France, 1807-1994”, mimeo, Paris-Jourdan
and UCLA, 2003 [article en format pdf]
E. Saez et M. Veall, « High Incomes in Canada, 1920-2000 »,
mimeo, Berkeley, 2002 [article en format
pdf]
Travaux sur working rich vs lazy poor:
* D. Costa, “The Unequal Work Day: A Long-Term View”,
NBER Working Paper n°6419 (February 1998) [article en
format pdf] (version plus complète parue dans Journal of Labor Economics
18 (1) (January 2000), pp.156-181)
R.W. Fogel, The Fourth Great Awakening and the Future of
Egalitarianism, University of Chicago Press, 2000
Articles sur la
sous-estimation de l’inflation et la croissance du pouvoir d’achat sur longue
période :
* D. Costa, “Estimating Real Income in the United States from 1888 to
1994: Correcting CPI Bias Using Engel Curves” , Journal of Political Economy
109(6) (2001), pp.1288-1310 [article en
format pdf]
F. Lequiller, “L’indice des
prix à la consommation surestime-t-il l’inflation?”, Economie et
Statistiques 303 (Mars 1997), pp.3-32
3. La montée des
inégalités depuis les années 1970-1980 : changement technique ou
institutions ? (1 séance)
D. Acemoglu, « Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market »,
NBER Working Paper n°7800 (July 2000) [article
en format pdf]
* D. Acemoglu, “Cross-Country Inequality Trends”, NBER Working Paper
n°8832 (2002) [article en format pdf]
D. Autor, F. Lévy et R. Murnane, “The Skill Content of Recent
Technological Change : An Empirical Exploration”, Quarterly Journal of
Economics 2003 [article en format pdf]
** M. Bertrand et S. Mullainathan, “Do CEOs Set Their Own Pay ? The
Ones Without Principals Do”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (3)
(August 2001), pp.901-932 [article
en format pdf]
* F.D. Blau et L.M. Kahn, “Do Cognitive Test Scores Explain Higher US
Wage Inequality?”, NBER Working Paper n°8210 (April 2001) [article
en format pdf]
* D. Card et J. DiNardo, “Skill-Biased Technical Change and Rising Wage
Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles”, NBER Working Paper 8769 (2002) [article en format pdf]
D. Card et T. Lemieux, “Can Falling Supply Explain The Rising Return to
College for Younger Men? A Cohort-Based Analysis”, Quarterly Journal of
Economics 116(2) (2001), pp.705-746 [article
en format pdf]
J. DiNardo et S. Pishke, “The Returns to Computer Use Revisited: Have
Pencils Changed the Wage Structure Too?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics
112(1) (1997), pp.291-303 [article en
format pdf]
* D.S. Lee, “Wage Inequality in the United States during the 1980s:
Rising Dispersion or Falling Minimum Wage?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics
114 (3) (August 1999), pp.977-1023 [article en
format pdf]
* J. Rotemberg, “Perceptions of Equity and the Distribution of Income”,
mimeo, Harvard, 2000 [article en format pdf]
4. Inégalités et commerce international (1,5 séance)
Repères théoriques : au-delà du modèle Hecksher-Olhin
* A. Banerjee et A.
Newman, « Inequality, Growth and Trade Policy », mimeo, MIT, 2003 [article en format pdf]
* M. Kremer et E. Maskin, « Globalisation and Inequality », mimeo, Harvard, 2003 [article en format pdf]
T. Piketty, «Immigration et justice sociale », Revue Economique 48(5), pp.1291-1309 (1997) [article en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur l’impact du commerce sur les inégalités:
* A. Banerjee et T.
Piketty, “Top Indian Incomes, 1956-2000”, Bread Working Paper 46 (2003) [article en format pdf]
M. Clemens et J.
Williamson, “Wealth Bias in the First Global Capital Market Boom, 1870-1913”,
mimeo, Harvard, 2001 [article en
format pdf]
R. Freeman,
« Trade wars : the Exaggerated Impact of Trade in Economic
Debate », NBER Working Paper 10000 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
C. Gilbert et P.
Varangis, “Globalisation and International Commodity Trade with Specific
Reference to the West African Cocoa Producers”, NBER Working Paper 9668 (2003) [article en format pdf]
O. Attanazio, P.
Goldberg et N. Pavenik, “Trade Reforms and Wage Inequality in Columbia”, NBER
Working Paper 9830 (2003) [article en
format pdf]
C. Blattman, J. Hwang
et J. Williamson, “The Terms of Trade and Economic Growth in the Periphery“,
NBER Working Paper 9940 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
J. Heckman et X.Li, “Selection Bias, Comparative Advantage
and Heterogenous Returns to Education – Evidence from China in 2000”,
mimeo, 2003 [article en format pdf]
J. Marseille, “Empire colonial et capitalisme français”, in La France d’Outre-Mer – Un siècle de relations monétaires et financières, CHEFF 1998
B. Milanovic,
« Income Convergence During the Disintegration of the World Economy,
1919-1939 », 2002 [article en format pdf]
B. Milanovic, “Can We
Discern the Effect of Globalization on Income Distribution? Evidence from
Household Surveys”, 2003 [article en format
pdf]
K. O’Rourke,
“Globalization and Inequality: Historical Trends”, NBER Working Paper 8339 (2001)
[article en format pdf]
* K. O’Rourke et J.
Williamson, “The Hecksher-Olhin Model Between 1400 and 2000: When it Explained
Factor Price Convergence, When it Did Not, and Why”, mimeo, 1999 [article en format pdf]
* K. O’Rourke et J.
Williamson, “From Malthus to Olhin: Trade, Growth and Distribution since 1500”,
CEPR Discussion Paper 3394 (2002) [article
en format pdf]
* S. J. Wei et Y. Wu,
“Globalization and Inequality: Evidence from Within China”, NBER Working Paper
8611 (2001) [article en format pdf]
J. Williamson, “The
Evolution of Global Labor Markets since 1830: Background Evidence and Hypotheses”,
Explorations in Economic History 32 (1995), 141-196 [article en format pdf]
J. Williamson, “Was it Stolper-Samuelson, Infant Industry or Something Else? World Tariffs 1789-1938”, NBER Working Paper 9656 (2003) (article en format pdf]
5. Inégalités et
éducation, I : expériences naturelles et rendements de l’éducation (2 séances)
Estimation des rendements de l’éduction
– limites des données sur mobilité sociale et éduction :
E.
Maurin, “The Impact of Parental Income on Early Schooling Transitions: A
Re-Examination Using Data over Three Generations”, Journal of Public
Economics 85(3) (2002), pp.301-332 [article en
format pdf]
J. Shea, “Does Parents’ Money Matter?”, Journal of Public Economics
77 (2), pp.155-184 (2000) [article en format pdf]
Estimation des rendements de
l’éducation – l’apport des expériences naturelles:
** J. Angrist et A. Krueger, “Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect
Schooling and Earnings?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4) (1991),
pp.979-1014 [article en format pdf]
** O. Ashenfelter et C. Rouse, “Income, Schooling and Ability: Evidence
from a New Sample of Twins”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(1)
(1998), pp.253-284 [article en format
pdf]
S. Black, P. Devereux et K. Salvanes, “Is Education Inherited ?
Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital”, mimeo UCLA,
2003 [article en format pdf]
A. Björklund, M. Lindahl et E. Plug, “Intergenerational Effects in
Sweden: What Can We Learn from Adoption Data?” , mimeo, Stockholm et Amsterdam [article en format pdf]
A. Chevalier, C. Harmon, I. Walker et Y. Zhu, « Does Education
Raise Productivity or Just Reflect It ? », CEPR Discussion Paper 3993
(2003) [article en format pdf]
* E. Duflo, “Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School
Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Unusual Policy Experiment”, American
Economic Review 91 (4) (September 2001), pp.909-926 [article en
format pdf]
J. Grenet, « Suffit-il
d’allonger la scolarité obligatoire pour augmenter les salaires ? Le cas
de la réforme Berthoin », mémoire de Dea, Paris-Jourdan, 2003 [article en format pdf]
K. Hansen, J. Heckman et K. Mullen, “The Effect of Schooling and Ability
on Achievement Test Scores”, NBER Working Paper 9881 (2003) [article en format pdf]
P. Oreopoulos, “Do Dropouts Drop Out Too Soon? Evidence from Changes in
School-Leaving Laws”, mimeo, Toronto, 2003 [article
en format pdf]
L’impact de la taille des
classes sur la performance scolaire:
** J. Angrist et V. Lavy, “Using Maimonides’ Rule to Estimate the Effect
of Class Size on Student Achievement”, Quarterly Journal of Economics
114(2) (1999), pp.533-574 [article en
format pdf]
* C. Hoxby, “The Effect of Class Size on Student Achievment: Evidence
from Population Variation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4)
(2000), pp.1239-1285 [article en format pdf]
* A. Krueger, “Experimental Estimates of Education Production
Functions”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2) (1999), pp.497-532 [article en format pdf]
L. Wossman et M. West, “Class-Size Effects in School Systems Around the
World: Evidence from Between-Grade Variation in TIMSS”, mimeo, Kiel et Harvard,
2002 [article en format pdf]
L’impact des incitations
financières sur la performance scolaire:
J. Angrist et V. Lavy, “The Impact of High School Matriculation Awards:
Evidence from Randomized Trials”, NBER Working Paper 9389 (2002) [article en format pdf]
* R. Benabou, F. Kramarz et
C. Prost, « Augmenter les ressources des collèges défavorisés : une
évalution empirique des Zones d’Education Prioritaires », mimeo, Princeton
et Crest, 2002 [article en format pdf]
* P. Glewwe, N. Ilias et M. Kremer, « Teacher Incentives »,
NBER Working Paper 9671 (2003) [article en
format pdf]
* V. Lavy, “Paying for Performance: The Effect of Financial Incentives
on Teachers’ Effort and Students’ Scholastic Outcomes”, mimeo, Jerusalem, 2003 [article en format pdf]
6. Inégalités et
éducation, II : ségrégation locale et « peer effects » (1,5 séance)
Repères théoriques :
R. Benabou, “Workings of a City: Location, Education and Production”, Quarterly
Journal of Economics 108 (1993), 619-653 [article
en format pdf]
Estimations empiriques de
l’ampleur des « peer efffects » :
J. Angrist, « How Important Are Classroom Peer Effects ?
Evidence from Boston’s Metco Program”, NBER Working Paper 9263 (2002) [article en format pdf]
P. Arcidiano et S. Nicholson, “Peer Effects in Medical Schools”, mimeo
2003 [article en format pdf]
S. Black, « Do Better Schools Matter ? Parental Valuation of
Elementary Education”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2) (1999),
pp.577-599 [article en format pdf]
G. Duncan, J. Boisjoly,
D. Levy, M. Kremer et J. Eccles, “Empathy or Antipathy? The Consequences of
Racially and Socially Diverse Peers on Attitudes and Behaviors”, mimeo,
Harvard, 2003 [article en format pdf]
A. Falk et A. Ichino,
“Clean Evidence on Peer Effects”, mimeo, EUI, 2003 [article en format pdf]
M. Fertig et C.
Schmidt, “The Role of Background Factors for Reading Litteracy: Straight
National Scores in the Pisa 2000 Study”, CEPR Discussion Paper 3544 (2002) [article
en format pdf]
E. Gould, V. Lavy et D. Paserman, “Immigrating to Opportunity –
Estimating the Effect of School Quality Using a Natural Experiment on Ethiopans
in Israël”, CEPR Discussion Paper 4052 (2003) [article en format pdf]
D. Goux et E. Maurin, « Neighborhood Effects on Performance at
School », mimeo, Crest, 2003 [article en
format pdf]
* C. Hoxby, “Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and
Race Variation”, NBER Working Paper 7867 (2000) [article
en format pdf]
C. Hoxby, “All School Finance Equalizations Are Not Created Equal”, Quarterly
Journal of Economics 116(4) (2001), pp.1189-1231 [article en format pdf]
M. Kremer et D. Levy, “Peer Effects and Alcohol Use Among College
Students”, NBER Working Paper 9876 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
B. Sacerdote, “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Evidence from
Dartmouth Roommates”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 2001 [article en format pdf]
S.V. Schnepf, “A Sorting Hat that Fails? The Transition from Primary to
Secondary School in Germany”, Innocenti Working Papers 92 (2003) [article en format pdf]
G. Winston et D. Zimmerman, “Peer Effects in Higher Education”, NBER Working
Paper 9501 (2003) [article en format pdf]
7. Inégalités et
éducation, III : compétition public/privé et financement (1,5 séance)
L’impact de la compétition
entre écoles sur la performance scolaire :
J. Altonji, T. Edler, C. Taber, “A Evaluation of Instrumental Variable
Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schools”, NBER Working Paper
9358 (2002) [article en format pdf]
J. Angrist, E. Bettinger, E. Bloom, E. King et M. Kremer, “Vouchers for
Private Schooling in Columbia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment”,
NBER Working Paper 8343 (2001) [article
en format pdf]
* C. Graddy et M. Stevens, “The Impact of School Inputs on School
Performance: An Empirical Study of Private Schools in the UK”, CEPR Discussion
Paper 3776 (2003) [article en format
pdf]
G. Holmes, J. DeSimone et N. Rupp, « Does School Choice Increase
School Quality ? », NBER Working Paper 9683 (2003) [article en format pdf]
C. Hoxby, “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?”,
NBER Working Paper 4978 (1994) [article en
format pdf]
C. Hoxby, “How Teachers’ Unions Affect Education Production”, Quarterly
Journal of Economics 111(3) (1996), pp.671-718 [article en format pdf]
C. Hoxby, “Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and
Taxpayers?”, American Economic Review 90(5) (2000), pp.1210-1238 [article en format pdf]
C.T. Hsieh et M. Urquiola, « When Schools Compete, How do they
Compete ? An Assessment of Chile’s Nationwide School Voucher Program”,
Bread Working Paper 45 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
J. Rothstein, “Good Principals or Good Peers?”, mimeo, Berkeley, 2002 [article en format pdf]
C.E. Rouse, “Private School Vouchers and Student Achivement: An
Evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program”, Quarterly Journal of
Economics 113(2) (1998), pp.553-602 [article
en format pdf]
Frais d’inscription et
inégalités d’accès à l’enseignement supérieur :
C. Avery et C. Hoxby, “Do and Should Financial Aid Packages Affect
Students’ College Choices?”, NBER Working Paper 9482 (2003) [article en format pdf]
R. Gary-Bobo et A. Trannoy,
« Subventions et droits d’inscriptions optimaux dans l’économie des
universités », mimeo, Thema, 2003 [article
en format pdf]
T. Kane, “A Quasi-Experimental Estimate of the Impact of Financial Aid
on College-Going”, NBER Working Paper 9703 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
* D. Linsenmeier, H. Rosen et C.E. Rouse, “Financial Aid Packages and
College Enrollment Decisions: An Econometric Case Study”, NBER Working Paper 9228 (2003) [article en format pdf]
* B. Terry Long, “The Impact of Federal Tax Credits for Higher Education
Expenses”, NBER Working Paper 9553 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
8. Inégalités et discrimination (1,5 séance)
Repères théoriques sur les modèles de discrimination statistique
S. Coate et G. Loury,
« Will Affirmative Action Eliminate Negative Stereotypes ? », American
Economic Review 83 (1993), 1220-1241 [article
en format pdf]
T. Piketty,
“Self-Fulfilling Beliefs About Social Status”, Journal of Public Economics
70 (1998), 115-132 [article en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur la discrimination raciale :
** M. Bertrand et S.
Mullainhantan, “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A
Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination”, NBER Working Paper 9873
(2003) [article en format pdf]
F. Collins et R.
Margo, “Historical Perspectives on Racial Differences in Schooling in the United
States”, NBER Working Paper 9770 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
* K. Hoff et P.
Pandey, “Why Are Social Inequalities So Durable? An Experimental Test of the
Effects of Indian Caste on Performance”, mimeo, World Bank [article en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur les discriminations hommes/femmes :
J. Albrecht, A. Björklund et S. Vroman, “Is
There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden?“, mimeo, Stockholm, 2001 [article
en format pdf]
J. Dolado et V.
Llorens, “Gender Wage Gaps by Education in Spain: Glass Floors vs Glass
Ceilings”, mimeo, Madrid, 2003 [article en
format pdf]
* L. Gonzales,
“Single Mothers and Work”, mimeo, Northwestern, 2003 [article en format pdf]
A. Gosling, “The
Changing Distribution of Male and Female Wages, 1978-2000: Can the Simple
Skills Story Be Rejected?”, CEPR Discussion Paper 4045 (2003) [article en format pdf]
* V. Lavy, “Stereotyping and Gender Biases in Perceptions of Cognitive
Ability: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Among Public School Teachers”,
mimeo, Jerusalem, 2003 [article en format pdf]
T. Piketty, “Gender Bias in Income Survey Response”, mimeo,
Paris-Jourdan, 2003
9. Inégalités et
structures familiales
(2 séances)
Conflits hommes/femmes et
allocation des ressources:
* J. Angrist, “How Do Sex Ratios Affect Marriage and Labor Markets?
Evidence from America’s Second Generation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics
117(3) (2002), pp.997-1038 [article en format
pdf]
S. Aura, “Does the Balance of Power Within a Family Matter? The Case of
the Retirement Equity Act”, mimeo, 2001, MIT [article
en format pdf]
P.A. Chiappori, B. Fortin et G. Lacroix, « Marriage Market, Divorce
Legislation and Household Labor Supply », Journal of Political Economy
2002 [article
en format pdf]
E. Duflo, “Child Health and Household Ressources in South Africa:
Evidence from the Old Age Pension Program”, American Economic Review 90
(2) (May 2000), pp.393-398 [article en
format pdf]
** E. Duflo et C. Udry, “Risk and Intra-Household Allocation in Côte
d’Ivoire”, mimeo MIT 2001 [article en format
pdf]
M. Tertilt, « Polygyny and Poverty », mimeo, Minnesota, 2003 [article en format pdf]
L’impact du divorce sur les
enfants:
A. Bjorklund et M. Sundstrom, « Parental Separation and Children’s
Educational Attainment : A Siblings Approach », mimeo 2002 [article en format pdf]
D. Ginther et R. Pollack, “Does Family Structure Affect Children’s
Educational Outcomes?”, NBER Working Paper 9628 (2003) [article en format pdf]
J. Gruber, “Is Making Divorce Easier Bad For Children? The Long Run
Implications of Unilateral Divorce”, NBER Working Paper n°7968 (October 2000) [article en
format pdf]
R. Murphy, “Family Values and the Value of Families: Theory and Evidence
of Marriage as an Institution”, mimeo, Virginia, 1999 [article en format pdf]
* T. Piketty, “The Impact of Divorce on School Performance: Evidence
from France, 1968-2001”, mimeo EHESS, 2003 [article
en format pdf]
I. Rasul, “The Impact of
Divorce Laws on Marriage”, mimeo, Chicago, 2003 [article
en format pdf]
B. Stevenson et J. Wolfers
(2000), « ‘Till Death Do Us Part : Effects of Divorce Laws on
Suicide, Domestic Violence and Spousal Murder », mimeo, Harvard, 2000 [article
en format pdf]
J. Wolfers, “Did
Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results”,
NBER Working Paper 10014 (2003) [article en
format pdf]
L’impact de la fiscalité sur les incitations au mariage:
S. Buffeteau et D.
Echevin, « Taxation, Marriage and Labor Supply : Evidence from a
Natural Experiment in France”, mimeo, 2003, Insee [article en format pdf]
* M. Baker, E. Hanna
et J. Kantarevic, “The Married Widow: Marriage Penalties Matter”, NBER Working Paper
9782 (2003) [article en format pdf]
Législation sur l’avortement
et investissement dans les enfants:
* J.J.
Donohue et S.D. Levitt, “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime”, Quarterly
Journal of Economics 116 (2) (May 2001), pp.379-401 [article
en format pdf]
J. Gruber, P. Levine et D. Staiger, « Abortion Legalization and
Child Living Circumstances: Who is the Marginal Child?”, Quarterly Journal
of Economics 114(1) (1999), pp.263-291 [article
en format pdf]
T. Joyce, “Did Legalized Abortion Lower Crime?”, NBER Working Paper
n°8319 (June 2001) [article en
format pdf]
* C. Pop-Eleches, “Socio-Economic Outcomes of Unwanted Children:
Evidence From a Change in Abortion Legislation in Romania”, mimeo, Harvard,
2002 [article
en format pdf]
C. Pop-Eleches, “The Supply of Birth Control Methods, Education and
Fertility: Evidence from Romania”, mimeo Harvard 2002 [article
en format pdf]
L’impact de la taille et du
sexe de la fratrie sur les comportements:
** J. Angrist et W. Evans, “Children and Their Parents’ Labor
Supply : Evidence from Exogenous Variation in Family Size”, American
Economic Review 88(3) (1998), pp.450-476 [article en format pdf]
* D. Goux et E. Maurin, “The Effect of Overcrowded Housing on Children’s
Performance at School”, mimeo, Crest, 2001 [article
en format pdf]
Repères théoriques sur
inégalités patrimoniales et taxation optimale du capital:
A. Banerjee et A. Newman (1993), « Occupational Choice and the Process
of Development », Journal of Political Economy 101 (1993),
pp.274-299 [article en format pdf]
H. Cremer, P. Pestieau et J.C. Rochet, “Capital Income Taxation when
Inherited Wealth is Not Observable”, Journal of Public Economics 87
(2003), 2475-2490 [article en format pdf]
C. Chamley, “Capital Income Taxation, Wealth Distribution and Borrowing
Constraints”, Journal of Public Economics 79 (1) (January 2001), pp.55-70
[article en format pdf]
R. Gordon, « Taxation of Interest Income », NBER Working Paper
9503 (2003) [article en format pdf]
R. Morck, “Why Some Double Taxation Might Make Sense: The Special Case
of Inter-Corporate Dividends”, NBER Working Paper 9651 (2003) [article en format pdf]
** T. Piketty, « Income Inequality in France, 1901-1998 »,
CEPR Working Paper n°2876 (July 2001) (Appendix, pp.30-32) [article en format pdf]
E. Saez, “Optimal Progressive Capital Income Taxes in the Dynastic
Model”, mimeo, Berkeley, 2001 [article en format
pdf]
Sur l’inefficacité de la transmission
héréditaire du patrimoine :
F. Caselli et N. Gennaloll,
« Dynastic Management », Bread Working Paper 15 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
* D. Holtz-Eakin, D.
Joulfaian et H.S. Rosen, « The Carnegie conjecture : some empirical
evidence », Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (May 1993),
pp.288-307 [article en format pdf]
* R.K. Morck, D.A. Strangeland et B. Yeung, « Inherited Wealth,
Corporate Control and Economic Growth: the Canadian Desease? », in R.K.
Morck, Concentrated Capital Ownership, NBER/University of Chicago Press,
pp.319-369, 2000 [article
en format pdf]
** F. Pérez-Gonzalez, “Does Inherited Control Hurt Firms’ Performance?”,
mimeo, Harvard, 2001 [article
en format pdf]
D. Sraer, « Les
entreprises familiales sont-elles inefficaces ? Le cas des entreprises
françaises côtées de 1990 à 2000 », mimeo, Paris-Jourdan [article en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur les
contraintes de crédit:
** A. Banerjee et E. Duflo, “Do Firms Want to Borrow More ? Testing
Credit Constraints Using a Directed Credit Programme”, mimeo, MIT, 2002 [article en format pdf]
O. Lamont, “Cash Flow
and Investment: Evidence from Internal Capital Markets”, Journal of Finance
52 (1997), 83-109 [article en format pdf]
Littérature sur droits de
propriété, institutions et développement:
D. Acemoglu et S. Johnson,
« Unbundling Institutions », mimeo, MIT, 2003 [article en format pdf]
D. Acemoglu, S. Johnson et J. Robinson, « The Colonial Origins of
Comparative Development », American Economic Review 91 (2001),
1369-1401 [article en format pdf]
** A. Banerjee et L. Iyer, “History, Institutions and Economic
Performance: The Lgacy of Colonial Land Tenure System in India”, mimeo, MIT,
2002 [article en format pdf]
M. Burkart, F. Panunzi et A. Shleifer, « Family Firms », NBER
Working Paper 8776 (2002) [article en
format pdf]
* M. Goldstein et C. Udry, “Gender, Power and Agricultural Investment in
Ghana“, mimeo, LSE et Yale, 2003 [article
en format pdf]
R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer et R.W. Vishny, « The
legal determinants of external finance », Journal of Finance 52
(1997), pp.1131-1150 [article
en format pdf]
R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer et R.W. Vishny,
« Corporate Ownership Around the World », Journal of Finance
54 (2) (April 1999), pp.471-517 [article
en format pdf]
* R.G. Rajan et L. Zingales, « The Great Reversals : The
Politics of Financial Development in the 20th Century », NBER
Working Paper n°8178 (March 2001) [article
en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur les
comportements d’épargne et l’élasticité de l’offre de capital:
J. Bakija, W. Gale et J. Slemrod, “Charitable Bequests and Taxes on
Inheritances and Estates: Aggregate Evidence from Across States and Time”, NBER
Working Paper 9661 (2003) [article en
format pdf]
D. Bernheim, “Taxation and Saving“, in Handbook of Public Economics,
vol.3, édité par A.J. Auerbach et M. Feldstein, North Holland, 1999 [article en format pdf]
C.D. Caroll, “Why Do the Rich Save So Much?”, in Does Atlas Shrug? –
The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich, édité par J.B. Slemrod,
pp.465-485, Harvard University Press, 2000 [article
en format pdf]
K.E. Dynan, J. Skinner et S.P. Zeldes, “Do the Rich Save More?”, NBER
Working Paper n°7906 (September 2000) [article
en format pdf]
E. Engen, W. Gale et J. Scholtz, « The Illusory Effects of Saving
Incentives », Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1996), 113-138 [article en format pdf]
R. Gordon, L. Kalambokidis et J. Slemrod, « Do We Now Collect Any
Revenue from Taxing Capital Income ? », NBER Working Paper 9477
(2003) [article en format pdf]
J. Laitner et H. Ohlsson, « Bequest Motives : A Comparison of
Sweden and the United States », Journal of Public Economics 79 (1)
(2001), pp.205-236 [article en format
pdf]
* C. Mulligan,
“Capital Tax Incidence: First Impressions from Time Series”, NBER Working Paper
9374 (2002) [article en format pdf]
* C. Mulligan,
“Capital Tax Incidence: Fisherian Impressions from Time Series”, NBER Working Paper
9916 (2003) [article en format pdf]
* L. Summers,
“Capital Taxation and Accumulation in a Life Cycle Model”, American Economic
Review 71 (1981), 533-544 [article en
format pdf]
M. Wilhelm, “Bequest
Behavior and the Effect of Heirs Earnings: Testing the Altruistic Model of
Bequests”, American Economic Review 86 (1996), 874-892 [article en format pdf]
Les conséquences de la
compétition fiscale sur la taxation du capital en Europe:
M. Debonneuil et L. Fontagné,
« Compétitivité », Rapport du CAE, 2003 [article en format pdf]
M. Devereux, R. Griffith et
A. Klemm, « Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax
Competition », Economic Policy 35, 2002 [article en format pdf] [version ancienne]
M. Devereux, B. Lockwood et
M. Redoano, “Do Countries Compete Over Corporate Tax Rates?”, CEPR
Discussion Paper 3400 (2003) [article en format pdf]
H. Huizinga et G. Nicodeme, « Foreign Ownership and Corporate
Income Taxation: An Empirical Evaluation”, CEPR Discussion Paper 3952 (2003) [article en format pdf]
P. Lindert, “Why the Welfare State Looks Like a Free Lunch?”, NBER
Working Paper 9869 (2003) [article en format
pdf]
E. Mendoza et L. Tezzar, “A Quantitative Analysis of Tax Competition vs
Tax Coordination under Pefect Capital Mobility”, NBER Working Paper 9746 (2003)
[article en format pdf]
E. Mendoza et L. Tezzar, “Winners and Loosers of Tax Competition in the
European Union”, NBER Working Paper 10051 (2003) [article en format pdf]
Repères théoriques sur
la courbe optimale des taux marginaux d’imposition :
P. Diamond, “Optimal
Income Taxation: An Example with a U-Shaped Pattern of Optimal Marginal Rates”,
American Economic Review 88 (1998), 83-95 [article en format pdf]
* T. Piketty, « La
redistribution fiscale face au chômage », Revue française d’économie
12 (1) (hiver 1997), pp.157-201 [article en
format pdf]
* E. Saez, “Using Elasticities to Derive Optimal Income Tax Rates”, Review
of Economic Studies 68 (1) (2001),
pp.205-229 [article
en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur
l’élasticité de l’offre de travail des hauts revenus :
** M. Feldstein, “The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A
Panel Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act”, Journal of Political Economy
103 (1995), 551-572 [article
en format pdf]
A. Goolsbee, “What Happens When You
Tax the Rich? Evidence from Executive Compensation”, Journal of Political
Economy (April 2000) [article en format
pdf]
A. Goolsbee, “Evidence on the High-Income Laffer Curve from Six Decades
of Tax Reform”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1999:2.
R.H. Gordon et J. Slemrod, “Are
“Real” Responses to Taxes Simply Income Shifting Between Corporate and Personal
Tax Bases?”, in Does
Atlas Shrug? – The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich, édité par J.B.
Slemrod, Harvard University Press, 2000 [article
en format pdf]
J. Gruber et E. Saez, “The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and
Implications”, Journal of Public Economics 84 (2002), pp.1-32 [article en format pdf]
** T. Piketty, “Les hauts
revenus face aux modifications des taux marginaux supérieurs de l’impôt sur le
revenu en France, 1970-1996”, Economie et Prévision 138-139 (1999),
25-60 [article en format pdf]
E. Saez, “Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960-2000 :
Evidence and Policy Implications”, mimeo, Berkeley, 2003 [article en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur
l’élasticité de professions particulières:
* M. Showalter et N. Thurston, “Taxes and Labor Supply of High-Income
Physicians”, Journal of Public Economics 66 (1997), 73-98 [article en format pdf]
* J. Cullen et R. Gordon, « Taxes and Entrepreneurial
Activity : Theory and Evidence for the U.S.”, NBER Working Paper 9015
(2002) [article en format pdf]
H. Farber, “Is Tomorrow Another Day? The Labor Supply of New York Cab
Drivers”, NBER Working Paper 9706 (2003) [article
en format pdf]
(réactions des médecins français
aux changements du tarif des consultations: cf. « Les dépenses de soin de
ville remboursées par le régime d’assurance maladie – Une analyse économétrique
sur la période 1988-2002 », Etudes et résultats n°256, 2003, Drees [article en format pdf])
Etudes empiriques sur
l’élasticité de l’offre de travail des bas revenus :
D. Card
et P. Robbins, “Do Financial Incentives Encourage Welfare Recipients to
Work ? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation of the Self-Sufficiency
Project”, NBER Working Paper n°5701
(1996) [article
en format pdf]
B. Dormont, D. Fougère et A.
Prieto, « L’effet de l’allocation unique dégressive sur la reprise d’emploi »,
mimeo, CREST, 2001 [article en format pdf]
* N. Eissa et J. Liebman, “Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income
Tax Credit”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1996), 605-637 [article en format pdf]
A. Krueger et B. Meyer, “Labor
Supply Effects of Social Insurance”, NBER Working Paper 9014 (2002) [article en format pdf]
A. Leigh, “Who Gets the Earned
Income Tax Credit? Impact and Incidence”, mimeo, Harvard, 2003 [article en format pdf]
* B. Meyer et D. Rosenbaulm, « Welfare, the Earned Income Tax
Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers », Quarterly Journal of
Economics 116 (3) (August 2001), pp.1063-1114 [article
en format pdf]
R. Moffitt, “Economic
Effects of Means-Tested Transfers in the U.S.”, NBER Working Paper 8730 (2002) [article
en format pdf]
D. Neumark et W. Wascher, “Using the
EITC to Help Poor Families: New Evidence and a Comparison with the Minimum
Wage”, NBER Working Paper n°7599 (2000) [article
en format pdf]
** T. Piketty,
« L’impact des incitations financières au travail sur les comportements
individuels : une estimation pour le cas français », Economie et
Prévision n°132-133 (janvier-mars 1998), pp.1-35 [article
en format pdf]
Etudes empiriques sur
l’élasticité de la demande de travail :
D. Acemoglu at J. Angrist, “Consequences of Employment Protection? The
Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act”, Journal of Political Economy
109(5) (2001), pp.915-957 [article en
format pdf]
* B. Crépon et R. Desplatz,
« Evaluation des effets des dispositifs d’allègements de charges sociales
sur les bas salaires », Economie et statistiques n°348, pp.3-24
(2001) [article
en format pdf]
M. Fiole, V. Passeron et M.
Roger, « Premières évaluations quantitatives des réductions collectives du
temps de travail », Documents
d’études de la DARES n°35 (janvier 2000) [article
en format pdf]
J. Gruber, “The Incidence of Mandated Maternity Benefits”, American
Economic Review 84(3) (1994), pp.622-641 [article
en format pdf]
F. Kramarz et T. Philippon, « The Impact of Differential Payroll
Tax Subsidies on Minimum Wage Employment », Journal of Public Economics
82 (1) (October 2001), pp.115-146 [article
en format pdf]
K. Lang, “The Effect of Payroll Tax on Earnings: A Test of Competing
Models of Wage Determination”, NBER Working Paper 9537 (2003) [article en format pdf]
Autres thèmes
(probablement non traités en 2003-2004)
12. Les redistributions
à l’envers (cf.
également biblio 2002-2003)
Inégalités et privatisation
D. McKenzie et D. Mookherjee,
« The Distributive Impact of Privatization in Latin America: Evidence from
Four Countries”, mimeo, Boston University, 2002 [article en format pdf]
+competition in UK hospitals (Burgess CEPR)
+mortality effects of water privatization (NBER)
L’impact distributif de
l’assurance maladie:
* J. Bhattacharya et D. Lakdawalla, « Does Medicare Benefit the
Poor ? New Answers to an Old Question”, NBER Working Paper 9280 (2002) [article en format pdf]
T. Buchmuller, A. Couffindhal, M. Grignon et M. Perronnin, “Access to
Physician Services: Does Supplemental Insurance Matter? Evidence from France“,
NBER Working Paper 9238 (2002) [article
en format pdf]
J. Gruber et I. Washington, “Subsidies to Employee Health Insurance
Premiums and the Health Insurance Market”, NBER Working Paper 9567 (2003) [article en format pdf]
H. Levy et T. DeLeire, “What Do People Buy When They Don’t Buy Health
Insurance and What Does That Say About Why They Are Uninsured?”, NBER Working
Paper 9826 (2003) [article en format pdf]
D. Raynaud, “Les déterminants
individuels des dépenses de santé”, Etudes et résultats n°182 (2002), Drees [article en format pdf]
13. Inégalités et criminalité
M. Duggan, “More Guns, More
Crime”, Journal of Political Economy 109(5) (2001), pp.1086-114
D. Fougère, F. Kramarz, et J. Pouget, « Crime and Unemployment in
France », mimeo, Insee, 2003 [article en format pdf]
R. Freeman, “Why Do So Many Young American Men Committ Crime and What
Can Be Done About It?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1) (1996),
pp.25-42 [article en format pdf]
I. Kuziemko et S. Levitt, “An Empirical Analysis of Imprisonning Drug
Offenders”, NBER Working Paper 8489 (2001) [article en format pdf]
S. Levitt, “The Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates:
Evidence from Prison Overcrowding Litigation”, Quarterly Journal of
Economics 111(2) (1996), pp.319-351 [article
en format pdf]
S. Levitt, “Using Electoral Cycles in Police Hiring to Estimate the
Effect of Police on Crime”, American Economic Review 87(3) (1997),
pp.270-290 [article en format pdf]
S. Levitt, “Juvenile Crime and Punishment”, Journal of Political
Economy 106(6) (1998), pp.1156-1185 [article
en format pdf]