Economics of Inequality
Thomas
Piketty
Academic
year 2010-2011
Course Notes: Factor Shares and
Production Functions
Question: Are labor &
capital shares (factor shares) stable in the long run, & why?
1. Standard theory for factor share
stability: Cobb-Douglas production function
Cobb-Douglas
production function: Y = F(K,L) = KαL1-α
(typically,
α = 0.25 and 1-α = 0.75)
>>>
Then for any interest rate r and wage rate v, YK = αY & YL
= (1-α)Y
Intuition: with an elasticity of substitution between
K and L equal to 1, the substitution effect exactly compensates the price
effect
Demonstration: Take r and w as given.
Then profit maximization leads to FK = r
& FL = v
FK = r means α Kα-1 L1-α =
r
I.e. αY/K = r
I.e. YK = rK = αY
[Alternatively,
FL = w means (1-α) Kα L-α = v
, i.e. (1-α)Y/L = v,
i.e. YL = vL = (1-α)Y]
[Putting the capital demand and labor demand equations
together : K/L = [α/(1-α)]
v/r, i.e. if the relative price v/r rises by 1%, the capital-labor ratio
increases by 1%, i.e. annihilates the price effect]
>>> with a Cobb-Douglas
production function, the capital and labor shares are entirely determined by
technology: behavior – either labor supply or saving elasticities – does not
matter (note however that the assumption of competitive markets – firms maximize
profits by taking prices as given – does matter)
2. Beyond Cobb-Douglas : CES
production functions
In practice, F(K,L) does not seem to be exactly
Cobb-Douglas: historically, capital share was lower when capital/output was
lower >>> this suggests that the elasticity of substitution is above 1
Y = F(K,L) = [(1-a) L(γ-1)/ γ + a
K(γ-1)/γ]γ/(γ-1)
= CES production function with elasticity of
substitution between K and L = γ
Then if competitive markets r = FK = a K-1/γ
Y-1/γ
I.e. α = capital share = rK/Y = a (K/Y)1-1/γ
i.e. if we note β=K/Y, we have:
r = a β-1/γ
α = a β1-1/γ
I.e. r is always a declining function of β, but
α is an increasing function of β if and only if γ>1, i.e.
elasticity of substitution higher than 1
If γ=1, then Cobb-Douglas production function
F(K,L) = KαL1-α ,
α = a does not depend on β: price and quantity effects exactly offset
each other
If γ is infinite, then linear production function
F(K,L) = rK+vL, i.e. fixed capital return r and labor productivity v (labor can
produce output without capital, and conversely), so that capital share
increases proportionally with β
If γ=0, then fixed-coefficient (“putty-clay”)
production function F(K,L) = min(rK,vL), where r and v are entirely given by
technology: one hour of work produces v units of output iff only we have
exactly v/r units of capital per hour of work, i.e. extra capital is useless;
and conversely capital destructions are devastating: when K is divided by 2,
then Y should be divided by 2 (half of labor becomes useless)
3. Beyond
Cobb-Douglas: Multi-Sector Production Functions
Another way to go beyond Cobb-Douglas production
functions is to relax the homogenous good/single sector assumption. I.e. an
important implicit assumption in the formulation Y=F(K,L) is that there exists
a homogenous consumption and capital good, i.e. no long run divergence in
relative prices; e.g. no divergence in the relative price of land, real estate,
oil, services, etc.
For instance, it would probably make more sense to
divide national income between a housing sector component (=rental value of
housing) and a non-housing, “productive” sector component (=net output of other
sectors; “productive” is the wrong term because housing also produces positive
value):
Y = YH + YP
with
YH
= F(KH) = value of housing services
YP
= F(KP,L) = value of output from other productive sectors
On multi-sector growth models, see e.g. Baumol “The macroeconomics of unbalanced
growth” AER 1967